It is currently Fri Oct 19, 2018 10:46 am


All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: On a Cauchy sequence
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 6:32 am 
Administrator
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2015 6:12 pm
Posts: 837
Location: Larisa
Let $\mathbb{R}^+ =\{ x \in \mathbb{R}: x>0\}$. Endow it with the metric

$${\rm d}(x, y) = \left| \frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{y} \right|$$

  1. Show that the sequence $a_n=n$ is a Cauchy one.
  2. Is the sequence $\frac{1}{n}$ a Cauchy one?
  3. Show that any sequence $a_n$ in $\mathbb{R}^+$ converges in $\mathbb{R}^+$ in the metric ${\rm d}$ above if and only if it converges in $\mathbb{R}$ in the standard metric $|x-y|$ and that the limits in the two cases are equal.

_________________
Imagination is much more important than knowledge.
Image


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  

 Post subject: Re: On a Cauchy sequence
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2017 2:26 pm 
Team Member

Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:52 pm
Posts: 426
It's obvious that \(\displaystyle{d}\) is a metric.

i. Let \(\displaystyle{\epsilon>0}\). There exists \(\displaystyle{n_0\in\mathbb{N}}\) such

that \(\displaystyle{\dfrac{2}{n_0}<\epsilon}\). Then, for every \(\displaystyle{n\,,m\in\mathbb{N}}\)

such that \(\displaystyle{n\,,m\geq n_0}\) holds

\(\displaystyle{d(a_n,a_m)=\left|\dfrac{1}{n}-\dfrac{1}{m}\right|\leq \dfrac{1}{n}+\dfrac{1}{m}\leq \dfrac{1}{n_0}+\dfrac{1}{n_0}=\dfrac{2}{n_0}<\epsilon}\)

So, the sequence \(\displaystyle{\left(a_n=n\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}}\) is a Cauchy one.

ii. The answer is negative. If \(\displaystyle{b_n=\dfrac{1}{n}\,,n\in\mathbb{N}}\),

we observe that

\(\displaystyle{d(b_n,b_{n+1})=\left|n-(n+1)\right|=1\,,\forall\,n\in\mathbb{N}}\).

iii. Let \(\displaystyle{\left(a_{n}\right)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}}\) be a sequence of \(\displaystyle{\mathbb{R}^{+}}\).

Suppose that \(\displaystyle{a_{n}\stackrel{d}{\to} a>0}\), that is

\(\displaystyle{d(a_n,a)\to 0\iff \left|\dfrac{1}{a_n}-\dfrac{1}{a}\right|\to 0}\), which means that

\(\displaystyle{\dfrac{1}{a_n}\stackrel{|\cdot|}{\to}\dfrac{1}{a}\implies a_n\stackrel{|\cdot|}{\to}a}\)

Similarly,

if \(\displaystyle{a_n\stackrel{|\cdot|}{\to}a}\), then \(\displaystyle{a_n\stackrel{d}{\to}a}\).


Top
Offline Profile  
Reply with quote  

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Mathimatikoi Online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group Color scheme created with Colorize It.
Theme created StylerBB.net